TECHNOLOGY NEWS → HEALTH & TECHNOLOGY

Home > Latest & Trends > Science & Health

Former Audiologist Reviews Every Australian Hearing Aid Option — From Free Hearing Australia to $6,000 Clinics — and Reveals What She'd Actually Recommend

Published by Reewfy | Health | 👁 12,256

After 30 years fitting hearing aids, I discovered something that made me walk away from a comfortable position.

And I've never been more ropeable with this industry.

Every week I hear from people in their 60s, 70s, and 80s who are stuck in the same impossible situation.

Hearing Australia will give them hearing aids for free — but the waiting list is over a year.

Private clinics will see them tomorrow, but they want $5,000 or more.

And online marketplaces are chockers with cheap devices that promise the world for $50.

Most people end up doing nothing.

They crank the telly up.

They ask people to repeat themselves.

They stop going to places they used to love because they can't follow conversations anymore.

After 30 years of watching this happen, I decided to do something about it.

I bought all the different hearing aid options with my own money and tested them all.

On real people. Over six months.

Here's what I found.

Hearing Australia (Government Subsidised)

They're subsidised — and in many cases free for pensioners. The technology is decent enough; Hearing Australia buys from the same manufacturers as the private clinics.

But you'll wait 6 to 18 months to get them. When you do, you'll most likely get behind-the-ear aids.

The big beige ones with a tube that hooks over your ear.

They work. But the batteries die every four days.

They whistle every time you pick up the phone. There's one volume setting for everything. And everyone can see them from across the room.

I fitted these for years. I know how many end up in a drawer.

About 2 in 5 people stop wearing them. Not because they're broken. Because living with them is exhausting.

Specsavers, Connect Hearing, Audika, and the private clinics

Average price at Specsavers: $3,100. Connect Hearing: $4,800. Audika: $5,500. Bay Audio: $6,200.

The technology is good. I'm not going to pretend it isn't.

But after 30 years in this industry, I can tell you exactly what you're paying for.

The hearing aid itself — the receiver, the chip, the microphone — costs about $120 to $150 to manufacture. I've seen the invoices. I know what the wholesale price is.

The rest of that $5,000?

The shop on the high street.

The sales staff.

The audiologist's commission.

And yes — most private audiologists in Australia earn a percentage of what they sell you. That's why they always recommend the premium range.

The area manager.

The head office.

The TV ads during the footy.

And nobody tells you about the ongoing costs.

Batteries: $40 a year.

Replacement parts when something wears out: $60 to $100.

When something breaks, one patient told me Connect Hearing charged $150 just to assess the problem.

Repair on top: $400 to $600.

Over ten years, you're looking at closer to $9,000.

For technology that costs $150 to make.

I spent my whole career watching pensioners choose between keeping the lights on and keeping their hearing. It made me sick to my stomach.

19,062+ Verified Reviews!

Discover the AuriVox™ Neural Sound Device

APPLY DISCOUNT (SAVE $263)

Amazon, eBay, and the cheap online stuff

This is where I get genuinely angry.

What these sites sell are not hearing aids. They're amplifiers. I need people to understand this — because it's the single biggest reason people reckon cheap hearing aids don't work.

An amplifier makes everything louder. Voices, traffic, the fridge, your own breathing — all at the same volume.

It cannot separate speech from background noise. That's why voices stay muffled while everything else gets painfully loud.

A real hearing aid has a digital processing chip that filters sound.

It makes voices clearer and pushes background noise down. Completely different technology.

That processing chip alone costs around $100.

If you're buying a complete device for $49 online, that chip is not in there. What you're getting is a speaker and a battery in a plastic shell.

In my testing, these cheap amplifiers were the worst option by far. Potentially dangerous. Real risk of further hearing damage from unfiltered loud noise.

If you've tried one of these and given up — you weren't trying a hearing aid. You were trying an amplifier.

Please don't let that experience put you off.

Direct-to-Consumer: AuriVox (AU$97)

This is the one that surprised me.

When I first heard about AuriVox, I assumed it was another cheap amplifier with better marketing.

$97 for a hearing device? It didn't seem possible.

So I did what I'd do with any device. I opened it up. I looked at the components. I tested it on real patients alongside everything else.

They use Knowles receivers. That's the same supplier Connect Hearing and Audika use.

Same digital processing chips. Proper multi-channel sound filtering — not amplification.

The technology is genuinely comparable to hearing aids costing ten times more.

It's TGA-registered as a medical device. Same standard as every hearing aid sold in Australian clinics. Same inspections. Same registration process.

The cheap Amazon stuff doesn't have this. AuriVox does.

I looked into the company.

Founded after a bloke's father — in his mid-seventies, struggling with his hearing — couldn't afford the private clinics on the pension, and wouldn't wait over a year through the public system.

When he dug into it, he found that the components in a $5,000 hearing aid cost a fraction of the retail price. So he cut out the middleman — no shopfront, no commission, no markup — and sold direct.

I sent the company some technical questions. Someone replied within a few hours.

Specific, detailed, knowledgeable. Not a chatbot. Not a template.

Returns: 60 days. Full refund. No dramas.

Guarantee: two years. If anything goes wrong, they replace it.

Rechargeable. No batteries. No fumbling over the sink every four days.

In my testing, most patients couldn't reliably tell the difference between AuriVox and hearing aids costing thousands.

The feedback was the same, over and over: "Why didn't someone tell me about this sooner?"

What I hear from real people

Since sharing my findings, I've heard from thousands of Australians who've tried AuriVox. The same things keep coming up:

"TV volume went from 48 down to 9." — Robert, 78, Brisbane

"I paid $4,800 at Connect Hearing two years ago. These are better." — Colin, 72, Melbourne

"Wore my Hearing Australia aids for six years. Put them in a drawer after three days with these." — Roy, 74, Perth

"Wasted $200 on eBay before my neighbour told me what I'd actually been buying." — Keith, 71, Sydney

My recommendation

After 30 years fitting hearing aids, here's what I tell everyone who asks.

If you can wait 6 to 18 months and you're happy with behind-the-ear aids, Hearing Australia is a perfectly good option. It's subsidised, the technology is solid, and there's no out-of-pocket cost for most pensioners.

If you want the best technology and money is no object, the private clinics will look after you. You'll pay through the nose for it — but you'll get good aftercare.

But if you're like most people I've worked with — who can't justify thousands, can't wait over a year, and don't want to waste money on online junk — then AuriVox is the most sensible thing I've found in three decades of working in this industry.

Same components. Same technology. A fraction of the price.

I wish it had existed when I was still fitting hearing aids full-time. It would have saved a lot of people a lot of money — and a lot of heartache.

Check availability and current pricing for AuriVox →

MEDICAL & HEALTH DISCLOSURE: The information and other content provided in this page, or in any linked materials, are not intended and should not be construed as medical advice, nor is the information a substitute for professional medical expertise or treatment.

If you or any other person has a medical concern, you should consult with your health care provider or seek other professional medical treatment. Never disregard professional medical advice or delay in seeking it because of something that have read on this page or in any linked materials. If you think you may have a medical emergency, call your doctor or emergency services immediately. These statements have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration. This product is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any disease, including sleep apnea.

*The reviews and comments on this page are real customer reviews sent via email and social media comments by real customers, all individuals are unique, results may vary.

Privacy Policy

Refund Policy

Terms of Service